Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Rojas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00037
Defendant: City of New York, Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-10 and Police Officer Brian Sweeney
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas et al v. West Haven et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02011
Plaintiff: Helen Rojas , Irma Rivera and Alejandro Azana
Defendant: City of West Haven , John Karajanis , Ron Celentano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05093
Defendant: City of New York and Jane Doe and John Doe 1-10
Plaintiff: William Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas v. The Roman Catholic Diocese of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4132
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sandra Rojas
Defendant - Appellee: The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, The Pastoral Center of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester and Peter Enyan-Boadu, Individually
Cordero v. Kelly et al
as 1:2010cv02506
Plaintiff: Hector Cordero
Defendant: Kelly, Culyer, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youth Alive et al v. Hauppauge School District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01068
Plaintiff: Youth Alive, Youth Alive, Youth Alive and others
Defendant: Hauppauge School District, Board of Education of the District, Patricia Lesser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rojas v. The Roman Cathlic Diocese of Rochester et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2007cv06250
Plaintiff: Sandra Rojas
Defendant: The Roman Cathlic Diocese of Rochester, The Pastoral Center of the Roman Cathlic Diocese of Rochester and Peter Enyan-Boadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?