Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Limehouse et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02999
Plaintiff:
Shamark Limehouse, Kevin Freeman and Lloyd Paul
Defendant:
City of New York, "Joe" Smith and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackler v. Byrne et al
as 7:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Jackler
Defendant:
Matthew T. Byrne, Paul Rickard and Patrick Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nixon et al v. Blumenthal et al
as 3:2008cv01933
Plaintiff:
Karen Nixon, Theodore Driscoll, Andrew Matthews and others
Defendant:
Richard Blumenthal, Arnold Menchel, William Gundling and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Freeman v. Danaher et al
as 3:2008cv01669
Plaintiff:
Theresa Freeman
Defendant:
John A. Danaher, III, Mark Newland, Pete Terenzi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Stine et al
as 3:2008cv00494
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Lewis
Defendant:
Blake Stine, Robert Criscuolo, William Krauss and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lugo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv02931
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Lugo and Juan Pablo Lugo
Defendant:
City of New York, Martin F. Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deniran et al v. Mattingly et al
as 1:2007cv06159
Plaintiff:
Diemiruaya Ogheneakpor Deniran, Michael E. Noak, Jr., Shatina Unique Freeman and others
Defendant:
John B. Mattingly, Michael R. Bloomberg, Raymond W. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Jammin Entertainment Complex et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv02342
Plaintiff:
Jammin Entertainment Complex, George Crooks, Danraj Appan and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Abassi, Nikas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman-Drake v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 6:2007cv00331
Plaintiff:
Letisha B. Freeman-Drake
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
