Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05312
Plaintiff:
Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hasan El v. United States Attorney General-Main Office
as 1:2011cv05506
Plaintiff:
Abdul Muqaddim Hasan El
Defendant:
United States Attorney General-Main Office, The Honorable Judge Colleen McMahon-US District Court Judge, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Secondo
as 11-123
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Michael C. Secondo and Michael Secondo, individually, AKA Michael Charles Secondo
Defendant - Appellant:
Hunter Delivery Systems, Inc., DBA Hunter Delivery Systems, Inc.
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Secondo et al
as 1:2009cv05562
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Michael C. Secondo, Michael Secondo and Hunter Delivery Systems, Inc.
ThirdParty Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration, William Young and Rachel Baranick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Thomas-Anthony et al v. United States Of America, (IRS) et al
as 7:2008cv06434
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Anthony, Clavizzao and Susanna Armbruster
Defendant:
United States Of America, (IRS) and HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ballard v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
as 1:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Diane Ballard
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
