Cases 1 - 10 of 47,823
Copeland v. Goodwin
as 1:2024cv04361
Plaintiff:
Xaleta Copeland
Defendant:
Paul Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Stevens v. Nagle
as 6:2024cv06353
Plaintiff:
Tracy Stevens
Defendant:
Rhonda D. Nagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bulluck v. Broome County Sector Department of Corrections and Supervision et al
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Bulluck
Defendant:
Broome County Sector Department of Corrections and Supervision, David M. Stanton, Leslie Strykowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L.M. et al v. New York City Department Of Education,
as 1:2024cv04289
Plaintiff:
L.M. and L.M. on behalf of her child J.M., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Education,
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Ala v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
Kadafi Ala and Phillip Almeda
Defendant:
City of New York, Sergeant Charles Broughton, Detective Patrick Coward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McQuiller v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Gordon McQuiller
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grundstein
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Robert Harlan Grundstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Alleyne v. Lahar et al
as 7:2024cv04307
Plaintiff:
Roger Alleyne
Defendant:
Kevin Lahar, Jeremy Arroyo, Kevin Edgar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Anne Lamont, Kamala Harris, Ned Lamont and others
Marvin v. The State of New York
as 1:2024cv04362
Plaintiff:
Mark Marvin
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
