General Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Curry v. Annucci We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05325
Petitioner: John Curry
Respondent: Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Reardon
as 9:2022cv00878
Petitioner: John Curry
Respondent: Anthony J. Annucci and Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Graham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01227
Plaintiff: James E. Currie
Defendant: Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Clappius
as 1:2013cv04614
Plaintiff: Joseph Curry
Defendant: P Clappius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Griffin
as 12-2058
Petitioner - Appellant: James Curry
Respondent: Department of Correctional Services, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County and Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General, State of New York
Respondent - Appellee: Patrick Griffin, Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility
Defendant: Robert Dennison, Chairman of Parole, Marcia R. Kucera, Assistant District Attorney, Suffolk County, Steven A. Hovani, Appeals Chief, Suffolk County and others
Curry v. Phillip
as 11-2210
Petitioner - Appellant: Shymel Curry
Respondent - Appellee: W. P. Phillips, Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional Facility
Curry v. Morrissey
as 9:2007cv00477
Petitioner: Benny Curry
Respondent: James Morrissey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Laird
as 1:2007cv00369
Petitioner: Damar Currie
Respondent: Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry v. Phillips We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2003cv01123
Petitioner: Shymel Curry
Respondent: W. P. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?