Cases 51 - 60 of 204
Pena v. DOC
as 3:2016cv01813
Defendant:
DOC
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. DOC
as 3:2016cv01809
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pena
Defendant:
DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Fischer
as 16-3676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Schmelzle
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner for Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr., Deputy Commissioner, Karen Bellamy, Director, Inmate Grievance program (IGP) and others
Brogdon v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2016cv08076
Defendant:
City of New York, Department of Corrections, Kings County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Conell Brogdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04415
Plaintiff:
Ernest Murphy
Defendant:
City of New York , Captain Pittman, #969 (first name unknown), NYC DOC Officer Sinacore, #15459 (f/n/u) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrilla v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02677
Plaintiff:
Scott Parrilla
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, NYC DOC Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. The City Of New York , et al
as 2:2016cv01903
Plaintiff:
Adolph Prince
Defendant:
City Of New York, New York City Department of Correction, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of N.Y. et al
as 1:2015cv10187
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Smith
Defendant:
City of N.Y., DOC, BOC, NYC and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rhue et al
as 1:2015cv10053
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Smith
Defendant:
Saundra Rhue, Kenny Christopher, NYPD NYC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. UConn CMHC et al
as 3:2015cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
UConn CMHC, Judicial Branch and CT DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
