Cases 51 - 60 of 320
Phelps v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Darryl Anthony Phelps
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Duke Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America and Aaron J. Mango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorer v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2022cv10853
Defendant:
Paul B. Higgins, Leodan H. Contreras and United States of America
Plaintiff:
DeVonte Moorer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waug v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2022cv10631
Plaintiff:
Francine Waugh and Devonte Moorer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheng v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10536
Plaintiff:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. United States of America
as 9:2022cv01259
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Alfaro Acosta
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv07208
Plaintiff:
Trendell Walker
Defendant:
United States of America, Breon Peace, James H. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mescall v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv08348
Plaintiff:
Sean Fitzgerald Mescall
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prison, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schulte v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv05841
Plaintiff:
Josh Schulte
Defendant:
United States of America
Combs v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv07244
Plaintiff:
Marita Glynise Talley Combs
Defendant:
United States of America and Southern State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
