Cases 1 - 10 of 484
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grande et al
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Karen Grande and Janine Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carzoglio v. Klimek et al
as 1:2024cv02654
Plaintiff:
Angelo Carzoglio
Defendant:
Stanley Klimek, James McMahon, Kevin Krebs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Roberts et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts and Julian Roberts
Defendant:
Sidney B Jones, Lisa Johnson and Dorchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Corey et al
as 9:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Terrance Witherspoon
Defendant:
Joseph Corey, John Doe, Corrections Captain John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Roth
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Theryn Rashid Jones
Defendant:
Pamela S. Roth, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Blekis et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Blekis, Marcellin, Craig Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Beckert et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Beckert, Ross, Marcellin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Pritchard et al
as 6:2023cv06644
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Gary Pritchard, Rademacher, Sgt. Colucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
