Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Briglin v. Morley et al
as 9:2020cv00614
Defendant:
RN Jane Doe, Corrections Officer "John Doe #2", New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. Briglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. M. et al
as 6:2020cv06012
Defendant:
Mr. Heller, Stephen M. Ash, Dr. John Morley and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briglin v. Morley et al
as 6:2019cv06927
Defendant:
Dr. John Morley, Corrections Officer "John Doe #2", Dr. Cahill and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. Briglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. M. et al
as 6:2019cv06906
Defendant:
Dr. John Morley, Naiomi M., Ms. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Occhipinti v. Annucci et al
as 6:2019cv06651
Defendant:
G. Mohring, M.D. H. U. Sheikh, Osbourne McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Occhipinti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Miller et al
as 9:2018cv00738
Defendant:
Lieutenant J. E. Miller, Nurse D. Macey, Correctional Officer Seth M. Bombard and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Brown
as 18-1740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Defendant:
Pamela Bordinaro, Anthony J. Annucci, Joseph Bellnier and others
Abreu v. Brown
as 18-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Smith-Wallett v. City of Rutland et al
as 2:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Smith-Wallett
Defendant:
Rutland, City of , Rutland City Police Department and Ryan Ashe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv01634
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
