Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Manigat v. Maloney et al
as 1:2024cv03248
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Manigat
Defendant:
Officer M. Maloney, Officer E. Hoctor (9540), Officer J. Rios (8552) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton v. Lamont
as 23-99
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell Staton
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, C/O John Bowen, Lt. Oullette and others
Defendant:
Scanning Program - Robinson
Burton v. Ouellette et al
as 3:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burton
Defendant:
Ouellette, John Doe, Zelynette Caron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton et al v. Commissioner of D.O.C. et al
as 3:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton and Skylar Staton
Defendant:
Commissioner of D.O.C., Joseph, Divito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios v. Andola
as 9:2021cv00883
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rios
Defendant:
A. Andola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaker v. Gerbing et al
as 9:2019cv01253
Defendant:
C.O. Barber, P. Wolff, S. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. MTA et al
as 1:2019cv08165
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rios
Defendant:
City of New York and MTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles v. Quiros et al
as 3:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Kelly, Perez, Betances and others
Plaintiff:
David V. Myles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
