Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Crispin v. Walker et al
as 3:2021cv00886
Defendant:
John Doe, Nick Rodriguez, Craig Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Jossean Crispin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Payne et al
as 3:2021cv00637
Defendant:
Russell, Papoosha, Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Steuben County Jail
as 6:2017cv06622
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Shelton
Defendant:
Steuben County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Tillman
as 17-326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Defendant - Appellee:
James Tillman and Federal Bureau of Prison
Shelton v. Tillman et al
as 1:2016cv08188
Defendant:
James Tillman and The Federal Bureau of Prison Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaman v. Obus et al
as 1:2013cv04394
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Beaman
Defendant:
Michael Obus, Bruce Yelich and Correctional Facility - NYSDOCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Arnone et al
as 3:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Oscar L. Anderson
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, James E. Dzurenda, Brighthaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
Shelton C. Jones
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaman v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv01769
Plaintiff:
Shelton Beaman
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Joseph F. Belliner and Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaman v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS") et al
as 9:2012cv01770
Plaintiff:
Shelton Beaman
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS"), Down State Correctional Facility Officials and Bare Hill Correctional Facility Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
