Cases 11 - 20 of 229
Mazzacane v. Osborne Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mazzacane
Defendant:
Osborne Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Dane Daniel Tilley
Defendant:
Scott Semple, P. Pelzar, L. Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candella v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Daniel Candella
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larmon v. Queens Berry Correctional et al
as 1:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larmon
Defendant:
Queens Berry Correctional, Officer White, Sergeant Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zielinski v. Martuscello et al
as 7:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Zielinski
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, Corrine Leone and David Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culbreth v. Orange County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Kareem H. Culbreth
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, Daniel Cappeli, Joseph Cappeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Thibeault et al
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Nicole Thibeault, Daniel Perez, Renee Blondin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Doherty et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Daniel Doherty, Batten, F. Saleh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2023cv09810
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Griffin
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, C. Nixon, Mandel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
