Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 683
Jadoo v. Jadoo
as 1:2023cv04370
Plaintiff: Vijai Jadoo
Defendant: Jasmine Jadoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. Quattrone
as 23-733
Plaintiff / Appellee: Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Boulevard Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Greater Niagara Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant: Western New York Law Center and Bartel Miller
Defendant: Hon. Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts and Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant / Appellee: Sheriff James B. Quattrone, Sheriff John Garcia, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Erie County, New York and Sheriff Michael J. Filicetti, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Niagara County, New York
We The Patriots USA, Inc. et al v. Lamont We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00737
Plaintiff: We The Patriots USA, Inc., Matthew Sherman, Brandon Tischer and others
Defendant: Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carter v. Sewell
as 23-602
Plaintiff / Appellant: Darryl Chadwich Carter
Defendant / Appellee: Keechant L. Sewell, Police Commissioner New York City Police Department, Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York State and Letitia James, Attorney General of New York State
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom
as 23-544
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marion T.D. Lewis, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: The Government of England and the United Kingdom, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United Kingdom and The Institution of the British Monarchy or The Crown, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United King
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom
as 23-500
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marion T.D. Lewis, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: The Government of England and the United Kingdom, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United Kingdom and The Institution of the British Monarchy or The Crown, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United King
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Franklin County, New York et al
as 8:2023cv00470
Plaintiff: Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant: Franklin County, New York, Frances Perry and Edward Lockwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Milford Christian Church et al v. Russell-Tucker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff: Milford Christian Church, James Loomer, Janet Parady and others
Defendant: Charlene M Russell-Tucker, Beth Bye and Manisha Juthani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Trott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv06212
Plaintiff: Michael Myers
Defendant: Emily Trott and Cristy Torrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Sewell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff: Darryl C. Carter and Darryl Chadwich Carter
Defendant: Keechant L. Sewell, Kathy Hochul and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?