Cases 11 - 20 of 287
Smith v. Perez
as 23-7258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAIN PEREZ, Captain (Hartford CI), NICK RODRIGUEZ, Former Warden (Osborn CI) and ROLLIN COOK, Former Commissioner
Defendant:
PEREZ, Lieutenant (Osborn CI), DEVONIA LONG, Counselor Supervisor (Osborn CI), RAMOS, Lieutenant (Osborn CI) and others
Aron et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv09376
Plaintiff:
Theresa Roberts, Janet Dawson, Stephen Morris and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran and Lynn A. Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Thomas v. Federal Government
as 23-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN MACPHERSON THOMAS and Gucci
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, EDGARDO RAMOS, DISTRICT JUDGE and MICHAEL H. SPORN, -
Ramos Galan v. Garland
as 23-7142
Petitioner:
YOHANA SARAI RAMOS-GALAN and ASHLEY ELIZABETH ESCALANTE-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Ramos
as 23-6395
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGELIO RAMOS
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-946
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, Ralph Nieves, former NYPD Lieutenant, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Ware v. United States of America
as 23-869
Petitioner:
Ulysses Thomas Ware
Respondent:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Laura Taylor Swain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramos-Medrano v. Garland
as 22-6395
Petitioner:
JOHNNY RAMOS-MEDRANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
