Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 45
In Re: American Express Anti-S We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1766
Plaintiff: National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Intervenor: Gander Mountain Company, Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Holiday Companies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Qwik Lube LLC and LaJolla Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Defendant: Susan Burdette
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine
as 20-1603
Respondent: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, Self Insured Schools of California, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Walgreen Co. and others
Petitioner: Allergan Inc.
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-580
Plaintiff: National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cohen Rese Gallery, Inc., Lopez-Dejonge, Inc., Jasa, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others
Intervenor: Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Gander Mountain Company, Holiday Companies and others
Defendant / Appellee: American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc, and American Express Company
Defendant: Susan Burdette
New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund v. Endo Health Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01349
Defendant: CVS TN Distribution, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hollow Metal Trust Fund v. Endo Health Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01348
Defendant: CVS TN Distribution, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Hollow Metal Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Rockland, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 7:2019cv05588
Plaintiff: County of Rockland, New York
Defendant: Cardinal Health Pharmacy Services, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Caremark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
Gaminde v. Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc.
as 19-927
Defendant / Appellee: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc. and CVS Health Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: James Gaminde, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff: International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant: People of the State of California
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
The City of Rome, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2019cv00376
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: The City of Rome, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Lackawanna, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00485
Defendant: SpecGX, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Lackawanna, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?