Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,635
Roth v. Armistice Capital, LLC
as 24-950
Plaintiff: ANDREW E. ROTH
Defendant: ARMISTICE CAPITAL, LLC, ARMISTICE CAPITAL MASTER FUND LTD., STEPHEN J. BOYD and others
Collins v. Masonite International Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02779
Plaintiff: Kenneth Collins
Defendant: Masonite International Corporation, Robert J. Byrne, Howard C. Heckes and others
Cleary v. Austin Lloyd, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff: William Kevin Cleary
Defendant: Austin Lloyd, Inc., Austin Coins, Inc., Eric P Lesak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Grindle v. Austin Coins, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01125
Plaintiff: David R Grindle and David R. Grindle
Cross Defendant: Austin Coins, Inc.
Defendant: Eric P. Lesak, Patrick J. White, David Schmidt and others
Other: P. White Holdings, LLC and Brandon E. Chancey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Walton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 24-917
Plaintiff: DEBORAH WALTON
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JAMIE DIMON, in his individual capacity, CODOLIS LAW and others
Encarnacion v. Collado
as 24-911
Defendant: VITARIUS, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Vitarious, OLIVO, C.O.; Shawangunk Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff: BERNABE ENCARNACION
Shelton v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2024cv02581
Plaintiff: James E. Shelton
Defendant: Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. WILLIAMS HIGGINS and others
Cunny v. Bell
as 24-864
Petitioner: CHARLES CUNNY
Respondent: E. BELL, Superintendent
Weiss v. Kaman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff: Steven Weiss
Defendant: Kaman Corporation, Aisha M. Barry, A. William Higgins and others
Interested Party: Matthew Jones

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?