Cases 41 - 50 of 74
De Jesus-Hall v. New York State Unified Court
as 20-1360
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Unified Court System
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lorraine De Jesus-Hall
Fishman v. Office of Court Administration
as 20-1300
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Unified Court System, Nancy J. Barry, District Executive of 9th District NY Courts, in her administrative and official capacity, Michelle D'Ambrosio, In her administrative and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Judge Gordon Oliver, In her administrative and official capacity, Judge Alan D. Scheinkman, In his administrative and official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the 9th Circuit Courts, Judge Michelle I. Schauer, In her administrative and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marc Fishman
Hall v. US Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00277
Defendant:
Shapiro, Docaro & Barak LLC, D&V Legal Advertising LLC, US Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Uzamere v. The State of New York
as 19-3825
Defendant / Appellee:
Kathleen Donelli, Honorable Carl J. Landicino, John and Jane Doe, Office Manager Social Security and others
Defendant:
Sharon Kelly Seyers, Eric A. Tepper, Hemalee J. Patel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cheryl D. Uzamere, individually and as the Sole Proprietor of Uzamere Word Processing and more
Uzamere v. The State of New York
as 19-3402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cheryl D. Uzamere, individually and as the Sole Proprietor of Uzamere Word Processing and more
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Kaufman, Esq., Matrimonial practice advisory and rules committee for the New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration, Honorable Sondra Miller, Honorary Chair, Matrimonial Practice Advisory and Rules Committee for the New York State Unified Court System, Honorable Jeffrey Sunshien, Matrimonial Practice Advisory and Rules Committee, Statewide Coordinating Judge for Matrimonial cases for the New York State Unifeid Court System and others
Reid v. City of New York
as 19-3126
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Jaccarino, Defense Attorney after CPL 170.20, Cheyenne Snavely, M.D. at Bellevue Hospital Emergency Room, Officer Phoenix, New York City Police Department Transporting Officer from Trasit District 4 Police Station and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cory Reid
Utley v. Beideman et al
as 1:2019cv04798
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Noach Dear, Bruno Codispoti, Esq., The Kings County Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Natasha Utley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berrian v. New York State Unified Court
as 19-2065
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Unified Court System, Judge Eduardo Padro, In their official capacity and Judge Laura Ward, In their official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lenard Berrian
Treistman v. McGinty
as 19-1579
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony McGinty, Family Court Judge, Ulster County (FCJ), Other Unknown Named Trial Date Scheduling Clerks, assisting Anthony McGinty during Plaintiff's trial as to scheduling trial dates, The New York Family Court System, All within their personal and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ben Gary Treistman
Walker v. Tormey
as 19-963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nancy Rodriguez Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
Melinda McGunnigle, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Senior Assistant District Attorney of Onondaga County and William J. Fitzpatrick, Individually and in his Official Capacity as District Attorney of Onondaga County
Defendant:
Hon. James C. Tormey, Individually and in his Official Capacity as District Administrative Judge of the Fifth Judicial District of the Unified Court System of the State of New York and Michael A. Klein, Individually and in his Official Capacity as District Executive of the Fifth Judicial District of the Unified Court System of the State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
