Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 75
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff: Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant: Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant: Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Featured Case
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Oregon v. Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd et al
as 3:2019cv00657
Defendant: Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson, Teva Pharmaceutical Indus Ltd and others
Plaintiff: State of Oregon by and through the Oregon State Treasurer and the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Fund and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saada v. Golan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-820
Respondent: Narkis Aliza Golan
Petitioner: Isacco Jacky Saada
Amicus Curiae: Steven Marans, New York Legal Assistance Group, Her Justice Inc. and others
State of New York v. United States Department of Co
as 19-212
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant: Ron S. Jarmin, in his capacity as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
Defendant / Appellant: United States Census Bureau, an agency within the United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the Census and others
State Of New York et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2018cv08084
Plaintiff: State of Maryland, State of Illinois, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant: Principal Deputy Sol Daniel Jorjani, U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 703
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1988
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1525
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her official capacity and others
Trump v. State of New York
as 18-1314
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Respondent: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?