Cases 81 - 90 of 336
Kaul v. Murphy
as 3:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Connecticut General Life Insurance, Federation of State Medical Boards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mayo v. New Britain
as 21-460
Defendant / Appellee:
Carlos Burgos, Robert Stafford, Officer, Felix Perez and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alfred P. Mayo
Defendant:
A..J. Perez and City of New Britain
Reyes v. Westchester County Health Care
as 21-410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yacaira Reyes
Defendant / Appellee:
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, DBA Westchester Medical Center, Tim Murphy, Lisa Panton and others
Abdullah v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Marcus Caldwell, Michael D. Nalls, Catrice Byrd-Pippens and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Niagara Falls, Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Hooker Chemicals and Plastics Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cardone v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Edward Frank, Marachel Knight, Bethany Mayer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardone
Jones v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle, David Liddle and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Jones
Raul v. Marvell Technology Group Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Marachel Knight, Robert Switz, Tudor Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Raul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Cohen v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Chenming C. Hu, Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Cohen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
