Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 134
Aguirre v. Barr
as 20-51
Respondent: Director Carl DuBois, Director of the Orange County Correctional Facility, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director James McHenry, Director, Executive Office of Immigration Review and others
Petitioner: Efrain Fernandez Aguirre
Defendant / Appellant: Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Gomez Dubon v. Decker
as 19-4341
Petitioner: Omar Esau Gomez Dubon
Respondent: William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Kevin K. McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Thomas v. Decker
as 19-4228
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney general, U.S. Department of Justice and Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: Jahema Antonio Thomas
Liranzo de la Cruz v. Decker
as 19-3831
Not Yet Classified: Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kevin K. McAleenan, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Liranzo de la Cruz and others
Atanackovic v. Duke
as 19-3406
Defendant / Appellant: William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Mark A. Morgan, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Bojana Savic, Milan Atanackovic, J.A. and others
Connecticut v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv01597
Defendant: in his official capa Kevin McAleenan, Executive Office for Immigration Review, in his official capa James Mchenry and others
Plaintiff: State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Doe et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv08892
Plaintiff: Sanctuary For Families, Urban Justice Center, Make the Road New York and others
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Susan Quintana, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gonzalez-Reyes v. Delmonte
as 19-2543
Respondent: United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Respondent / Appellee: Todd Tryon, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Buffalo, New York Office, and Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Make the Road New York et al
as 1:2019cv04607
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Plaintiff: Make the Road New York and Center for Constitutional Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Velasco Lopez v. Decker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2284
Not Yet Classified: Kristjen Nielsen, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Carlos Velasco Lopez and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?