Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bagnall v. Becerra
as 23-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Michael Savage, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Bagnall v. Becerra
as 20-1642
Intervenor:
Jessie Ruschmann, Representitive of the Estate of Frederick Ruschmann, Louis Dziadzia, Loretta Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, George Renshaw, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Mary Smith, Representative of the Estate of Martha Leyanna and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Sarah Mulcahy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellee:
Brenda Hardy, Executrix of the Estate of Loretta Jackson and Michael Holt, Executor of the Estate of Charles Holt
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, AARP Foundation, National Disability Rights Network and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Lowe (Huertas)
as 19-2296
Defendant:
Robert Williams, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, Samantha Livingston, AKA Sealed Defendant 16, Bryan Rivera, AKA Sealed Defendant 15 and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Huertas, AKA Sealed Defendant 13
Bain v. Town of Hempstead
as 21-522
3Rd Party Defendant:
A-Furr-Ever Home, Inc, Lucrecia Skellenger, Shawn Barrows and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T. B., by his father and natural guardian
Defendant / Appellee:
Town of Hempstead Animal Shelter and Town of Hempstead
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bain
Barrows v. Brinker Restaurant Corporation
as 21-606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Savannah Barrows, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and Michael Mendez, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Brinker Restaurant Corporation, DBA Chili's Grill & Bar
Giuliano v. Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC. et al
as 1:2020cv03334
Defendant:
Moses Shyne Barrow and Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas Giuliano
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Yang v. New York State Board of Electi
as 20-1494
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joshua Sauberman, Jay Bellanca, Roger Green, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Andrew Spano, Commissioner, individually and in his official capacities at the NYS BOE, Peter S. Kosinski, Co-Chair and Commissoner, individually and in his official capacities at the NYS BOE, Douglas A. Kellner, Co-Chair and Commissioner, individually and in his official capacities at the NYS BOE and others
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo, As Governor of the State of New York
Amicus Curiae:
Jacqueline Bourgeois, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jacob Behr, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Vivian Johnson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Savage et al v. Azar
as 3:2018mc00074
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gary Goodman, Christina Alexander, Mary Smith and others
Plaintiff:
James Mulcahy, Denise Rugman, Shirley Burton and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, III
Interested Party:
Holy Name Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Savage et al v. Azar,III
as 1:2018mc00264
Plaintiff:
Michael Savage, Lee Barrows, George Renshaw and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Loretta Jackson, Christina Alexander, Mary Smith and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar,III
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
