Cases 41 - 49 of 49
The City of Ogdensburg v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 8:2019cv00782
Defendant:
Eveready Wholesale Drugs Ltd., Anda, Inc., Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Ogdensburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The City of Auburn v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv03800
Defendant:
Anda, Inc., Express Scripts Holding Company, Prime Therapeutics LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THE CITY OF AUBURN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
The City of Rochester v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 6:2019cv06490
Defendant:
Eveready Wholesale Drugs Ltd., Anda, Inc., Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wethersfield v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01041
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Wethersfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middletown v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00919
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Middletown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enfield v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00789
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Enfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwich v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00770
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Norwich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alpern v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05139
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alpern
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz v. Heatmax, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10016
Plaintiff:
Catalina Ruiz
Defendant:
Heatmax, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
