Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Doyle v. Exactech US, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03165
Plaintiff:
Paula Doyle
Defendant:
Exactech US, Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barker v. Doyle
as 7:2023cv08352
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barker
Defendant:
Gary P. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Bacher et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Beth Bacher, Joann Adams, Asha Atkins and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2881
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
Francesco Sanfilippo and Alexis Sanfilippo
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun, Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco and others
Claimant:
Kerrington Harvey, Jason Baldwin, Matthew Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
Mr. Doyle A Ebarb, Joseph K. Robbins, Ashanti Molton and others
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun, Francesco Sanfilippo, Carmelo Castro and others
Claimant:
Kerrington Harvey, Jason Baldwin, Matthew Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2883
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
Philip Torio, Phillip Fields, James Andy Woods and others
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun, Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco and others
Claimant:
Jennifer Simon, United States of America, Joshua Bruce Hook and others
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-2774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Defendant
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
Claimant:
Kerrington Harvey, Jason Baldwin, Matthew Montgomery and others
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-1884
Plaintiff:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Appellant:
United States of America
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Claimant:
Brandon Tolley
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Defendant
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-1765
Appellant:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Claimant:
Brandon Tolley
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
