Cases 121 - 130 of 103,206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jiang v. China Southern Airline Company Limited; et al
as 1:2024cv03558
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
China Southern Airline Company Limited;, Ministry of State of the P.R China and State Security Bureau of Guangzhou City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Megens-Sedor v. Priolo et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Alexander Megens-Sedor
Defendant:
Nicholas Priolo, Todd Baxter and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Saks Fifth Avenue Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Williams
Defendant:
Saks Fifth Avenue Corporation and Tyler Groff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cornish v. Town of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of New Britain, Calvin Wentworth, Matthew Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
