Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Morales et al v. Rembisz et al
as 3:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Adam Rembisz, Jonathan Webster, Karl Mortasiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Irianys Morales, Iris Gracia and Benjamin Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Public Health et al
as 3:2018cv01482
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jackson
Defendant:
Raul Pino, Dept of Public Health and Adrienne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ely v. Anderson
as 3:2017cv00967
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ely
Defendant:
Stephen Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Empire VI CT Portfolio, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson
Defendant:
Empire VI CT Portfolio, LLC, Samuel A. Gillespie, Michael D. Reiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osmond v. Dept of Economic & Community Dev et al
as 3:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Adam Osmond
Defendant:
Department of Economic and Community Development, Department of Administrative Services, Department of Housing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luciano v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Justice Luciano
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Carleton Giles, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagnese et al v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2015cv00975
Plaintiff:
Glorianna Lagnese , Rebound Hounds Res-Q, Inc. , Donald J. Anderson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Waterbury, Town of Manchester , Town of Southington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Public Health et al
as 3:2015cv00750
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jackson
Defendant:
Dept of Public Health , Jewel Mullen and Adrienne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Henderson v. Meriden et al
as 3:2013cv00873
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
City of Meriden, Jim Anderson, Edward Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
