Cases 11 - 20 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey et al v. Santander Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dr. Yvette Bailey, Kenneth Romer and Yvette Bailey
Defendant:
Santander Bank, N.A., Mary Jane Cavanaugh and Cavanaugh Appraisals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Garvey et al v. Adams
as 1:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
George Garvey, Adam Bianco, Anthony Figueroa and others
Defendant:
Eric Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Annis v. Vermont State Prosecutors
as 22-1990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Vermont State Prosecutors, T.J. Donovan, Bill Sorrell and others
Uzamere v. Uzamere et al
as 1:2022cv04876
Defendant:
Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, Austin I. Idehen, Esq., Democratic National Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv04645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Publius Publicola v. Lomenzo
as 22-795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Publius Publicola
Defendant / Appellee:
John Lomenzo, Town of Penfield, Joseph Valentino and others
Tyler v. City of Kingston
as 22-664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rashida Tyler, Anne Ames, Beetle Bailey and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Kingston
Annis v. Vermont State Prosecutors et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant:
Vermont State Prosecutors, T.J. Donovan, Bill Sorrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
