Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Sullivan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv07365
Defendant:
Jennifer Burch, City of New York, Detective John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Sprint Corp et al
as 3:2014cv01135
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Ross
Defendant:
Sprint Corp, Michelle Burch and Michael Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bentley v. Dennison
as 12-741
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Michael Bentley, Felix Tavares, James Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert J. Dennison, as former Chair, New York State Division of Parole (the Division) and in his individual capacity, Anthony G. Ellis, II, as former Executive Director of the Division and in his individual capacity, George B. Alexander, as former Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Division and in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
v. Burch-Minikan et al
as 3:2011cv01636
Defendant:
Laurel Burch-Minikan, New England Health Care, Employees Welfare fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
