Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Walia v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv05944
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Loretta E. Lynch and Janet Napolitano
Plaintiff:
Sunil Walia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garcon v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2012cv08112
Plaintiff:
Guy Robert Garcon
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano and Dept. of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
D'Alessandro v. Chertoff
as 12-576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Giuseppe D'Alessandro
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Chertoff, Former Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Michael B. Mukasey, Former United States Attorney General and others
Viehdeffer v. Tryon et al
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sharon Viehdeffer
Defendant:
Todd Tryon, Jisuan Kim, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
VanBrocklen v. The Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Russell VanBrocklen
Defendant:
The Department of Homeland Security and Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
