Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Reeves v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00659
Plaintiff:
Christine Marie Reeves
Defendant:
The State of New York, Albany County Family Court and Broome County Family Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02273
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rodriguez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01924
Plaintiff:
William Eric Rodriguez and Wildon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael F. Vecchione, Joseph Yates, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Reeves v. The Department of Children Youth and Families
as 1:2020cv00987
Plaintiff:
Christine Marie Reeves
Defendant:
The Department of Children Youth and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeves v. The Department of Children Youth and Families
as 6:2020cv06617
Plaintiff:
Christine Marie Reeves
Defendant:
The Department of Children Youth and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv00583
Plaintiff:
Shannon Joy, Duane Whitmer, Seth Duclos and others
Defendant:
Empire State Development Corporation, Jamie Romero, Douglas A. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
