Cases 11 - 20 of 955
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Gerken v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Lee Gerken
Defendant:
Thomas Gordon, Erin Scott, Rensselaer County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milea v. Hoveman et al
as 5:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Frank Louis Milea and Carpet Alley Incorporated
Defendant:
Virgina Hoveman, Grace Ghezzi, Madison County, N.Y. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Scott v. DoorDash et al
as 1:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Felicia Scott
Defendant:
DoorDash, Uber and Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MacDonald v. Great Neck Park District et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Scott MacDonald
Defendant:
Great Neck Park District, Frank S. Cilluffo and Jason Marra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Hart v. City of Middletown et al
as 7:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Marvin Hart
Defendant:
Marcelo Chasipanta, Scott M. Gallagher and City of Middletown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
