Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11152
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Neroni v. Zayas
as 14-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant - Appellee: Steven D. Zayas, Attorney, Committee of Professional Standards, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 3rd Judicial Department, In his official and individual capacity, Karen Peters, in her official capacity as Chief Justice of New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, Monica A. Duffy, Chairperson, Committee of Professional Standards, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 3rd Judicial Department, in her official capacity and others
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: William Nojay, Thomas Galvin, Roger Horvath and others
Defendant: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-36
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: William Nojay, Thomas Galvin, Roger Horvath and others
Defendant - Appellee: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
Bender v. City of New York
as 13-4873
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sherry Bender
Defendant - Appellee: Robert Corcoran, Lieutenant, N.Y.P.D., 009 Precinct, personally and professionally, City of New York, Svenstrip, Police Officer, Shield # 8986, personally and officially and others
Zavalidroga v. Cuomo
as 13-2853
Plaintiff - Appellant: Margaret Zavalidroga and Tomas Zavalidroga
Defendant - Appellee: Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and officially as Governor of the State of New York and Eric T. Schneiderman, individually and officially as Attorney General of the State of New York
Marcel v. United States of America
as 12-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant: Daniel Marcel, as Parent and Legal Custodian of Shaniya Heaven Marcel, Jr. also known as Daniel Marcel, infant Ruth OnalishaRodgriguez Marcel, also known as Ruth Marcel and formerly known as Baby Girl Pullin
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, State of New York, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, in his personal and official capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: William Baccaglini, AKA Bill Baccaglini and Jeremiah James Quinlan
John Doe v. Cuomo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4288
Plaintiff - Appellant: John Doe
Defendant - Appellee: Andrew Cuomo, as Governor of the State of New York, in his official and individual capacity, M. Sean Byrne, as Acting Commissioner of the State of New York Division of Criminal Justice Services, in his official and individual capacity and The New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?