Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Richardson v. Earp
as 12-3547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donnell T. Richardson
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy Earp, Jr., City of Niagara Falls Police Officer, Robert Gee, City of Niagara Falls Police Officer, William Thomson, Captain, City of Niagara Falls Police Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson v. Earp et al
as 1:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Donnell T. Richardson
Defendant:
Troy Earp, Jr., Robert Gee, Mike Trane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cadet v. Farabaugh et al
as 1:2011cv02903
Plaintiff:
Berthony Cadet, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Farabaugh, Sr. , Remax First Choice Realty , Michael Farabaugh , II,Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vandemark v. County of Ulster et al
as 1:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
Richard Vandemark, Jr. and Ellen Vandemark
Defendant:
County of Ulster, Paul J. Van Blarcum, John Sperath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goods et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01356
Plaintiff:
Bruce Goods, Bruce Goods, Dorthea Thomson and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Anthony Ruotolo, Nicholas Regina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
