Cases 31 - 40 of 148
Pare v. Valet Park of America et al
as 1:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Paul O Gaetone, Esq., Damian Tucker, Esq., John Hogan, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Louis Pare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramratton v. Brennan et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Petitioner:
Rabbideo Ramratton
Defendant:
Megan J Brennan and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Strujan v. American Online Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv09991
Plaintiff:
Elena Strujan
Defendant:
All Others Unlisted Both Known and Unknown, Apple Store Fifth Avenue, United States Postal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. United States of America
as 18-2608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Addison Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and United States Postal Service, Station Manager
Liu v. New York State Department of H
as 18-964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiao Qing Liu
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew DeCagna, Doctor Abigail Hawkins, Doctor Sunil Penesti and others
Defendant:
William F. Ryan Community Health Center, NENA, Fedex Corporation, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and others
Morse v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2018cv06184
Plaintiff:
Lisa Morse
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
