Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv06273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stuart v. Paulding
as 14-1207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Joshua Stuart
Defendant:
Gary Short, Town of Ulster Police Officer, Seyfarth, Town of Ulster Police Officer and Robert Haberski, Detective
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Paulding, Brian Robertson and Timothy Matthews
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robertson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03852
Defendant:
John Does #1-3, Officer Deven Okvist and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Darrin Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. City of Kingston et al
as 1:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wade
Defendant:
City of Kingston, County of Ulster, Edward Brewster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lionel Robertson
Defendant:
Police Officers Michael Scoloveno, Police Officer Jason Sharp and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trammell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00371
Defendant:
City of New York, Terrence Creighton, Trebor Evans and others
Plaintiff:
David Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Tunis et al
as 1:2012cv08855
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Robertson Tunis and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Fahey et al
as 5:2012cv00546
Plaintiff:
Malik Robertson
Defendant:
Joseph E. Fahey, James Delay and Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
