Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Norman v. Caretakers of the Constitution et al
as 1:2011cv06831
Defendant:
Caretakers of the Constitution, The United States Government, Colleet Corbin and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1590
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Prudential Life Insurance
as 10-449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alfreda Smith and Alfred Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Prudential Life Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Erez v. The Cfity Of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09633
Plaintiff:
Mendy Erez
Defendant:
The Cfity Of New York, Michael R. Bloomberg, New York City Police Department (NYPD) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uzamere v. Allen E. Kaye, P.C. et al
as 1:2009cv03506
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Defendant:
Allen E. Kaye, P.C., Uzamere and Associates, PLLC, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Uzamere v. Allen E. Kaye, P.C et al
as 1:2009cv01617
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Defendant:
Allen E. Kaye, P.C, Allen E. Kaye, Esq., Jack Gladstein, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith et al v. Prudential Life Insurance
as 1:2008cv08629
Plaintiff:
Alfreda Smith and Alfred Smith
Defendant:
Prudential Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
