Cases 41 - 50 of 401
Rogers v. Benedict et al
as 5:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Benedict, Rudolph Sohl, Sara Sohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiFonzo et al v. Niagara County et al
as 1:2022cv00588
Defendant:
Dr. Kori Ortt Gawrys, County of Niagara, Richard E. Updegrove and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas J DiFonzo and Lauren Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cyrus v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Odette K. Oliver Cyrus
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Mr. Duane Baldwin, Mr. Douglas Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jimenez v. Chung et al
as 2:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
John Jimenez
Defendant:
Roger Chung and Toolchand Bisram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bedore v. Lind
as 8:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
David H. Bedore
Defendant:
Roger Lind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Rogers v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
as 5:2021cv01351
Plaintiff:
Megan A. Rogers, Jebo, Hubert Rogers and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Treasury - IRS, Marcus Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
