Cases 61 - 70 of 173
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
I. (Anonymous) et al v. The Office of Court Administration et al
as 1:2018cv07419
Defendant:
Nicholas P. Smith, Rabbi Azriel Juda Katz, Jonathen Caceras and others
Plaintiff:
I. (Anonymous), M. (Anonymous), Miriam Schvimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Breeze, Jr. v. Samson Management LLC et al
as 1:2018cv09413
Defendant:
Best Western International, Inc. and Samson Management LLC
Plaintiff:
Byron Breeze, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adams v. City of New York
as 18-621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, William J. Bratton, New York City Police Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity, Bill de Blasio, Mayor, in his individual and official capacity as Mayor of The City Of New York and others
Tchatat v. The City of New York
as 18-404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Josias Tchatat
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York and Police Officer Liam O'Hara, Shield No. 20203
Defendant:
Police Officer Harry Arocho, Shield No. 24345, John Does, Richard Roes 1-50 and others
Best v. Friedman
as 17-2549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hilary Best
Defendant - Appellee:
David Friedman and Legal Aid Society
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
