Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Manning v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04747
Plaintiff:
James Manning
Defendant:
City of New York and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington et al v. Darvil, et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Campbell Washington, RockSteady Industries International LLC doing business as RSZ Media, RockSteady Recordz and others
Defendant:
Just Ice Campbell, Judges Ben Darvil, Jr., Diana Johnson and others
Debtor:
SRG-REM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bank of New York Mellon v. Moore
as 3:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon and Bank of New York
Defendant:
Johnny Ray Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Wright v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
Jethro Wright
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., William Koehler, Esq., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Manning v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
James Manning
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Adams, Department of Environmental Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
