Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cassell v. Umoh Firm
as 1:2023cv08454
Plaintiff:
James Cassell
Defendant:
Mr. Umoh Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fizzignolia v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06283
Plaintiff:
JAMES FIZZIGNOLIA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, The New York City Police Department, POLICE OFFICER CASSELLS and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Correction Officers Jane Does #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lahood v. Oprihory et al
as 1:2022cv05236
Plaintiff:
George Lahood
Defendant:
Francene Oprihory, Amen Atelek, Elizabeth Broderick-Oprihory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hilton
as 22-442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Laura E. Lufkin, Aaron M. Hilton, Charles Tirone and others
Johnson v. Hilton et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Aaron M Hilton, Laura E Lufkin, Charles Tirone and others
Panetta v. Cassel et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Christopher Dinapoli, Anthony Grosso, Mountain Rottie Rescue of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Panetta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartolini v. Cassels et al
as 7:2017cv05671
Plaintiff:
John A. Bartolini
Defendant:
Vincent Cassels , Thomas Kramer , Westchester County Department of Consumer Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00408
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Richards
Defendant:
The City of New York, Dean Cassells and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
