Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Strunk v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Defendant:
Warren "Bill De Blasio" Wilhelm, Jr., Voice for Choice: Planned Parenthood of New York City Action Fund, Inc., The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strunk v. The State of California et al
as 1:2016cv01496
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Defendant:
The State of California, Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr., Alejandro Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acorn v. United States of America
as 10-1287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Acorn, Acorn Institute Incorporated and New York Acorn Housing Company Incorporated
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Shaun Donovan, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Peter Orszag, Director Office of Management and Budget and others
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee:
The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Strunk v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2008cv01744
Plaintiff:
Christopher Earl Strunk
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, James C. Miller III, The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
