Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wright v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01749
Plaintiff:
George Wright
Defendant:
City of New York , Christopher Smith and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alamo et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv01497
Plaintiff:
David Alamo , Carlos Baez , Racquel Lopez and others
Defendant:
Christopher Smith, Heriberto Rodriguez, Richard Cretella, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. The Town of Stony Point et al
as 7:2013cv05000
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith and Linda Smith
Defendant:
The Town of Stony Point and The Town of Stony Point Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. The Town of Stony Point et al
as 1:2013cv05000
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith and Linda Smith
Defendant:
The Town of Stony Point and The Town of Stony Point Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haruna v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03866
Plaintiff:
Ali Haruna
Defendant:
The City of New York, Christopher Smith, Nelson Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04971
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Police Officer Scot Kashinsky
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3314
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
