Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 22-2953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, on behalf of U.S. Attorney General, Attorney General Letitia James, on behalf of the State of New York and others
Dotson v. Kuliesius
as 22-2915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Monique Dotson and Monique Deanna Dotson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dina Kuliesius, N.P., R.N. Elizabeth, D.O. Temitore Margaret Dube and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westry v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Eric Westry
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, Jeanette Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ferguson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Ronisha Ferguson, S.J. and A.J.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, KerryAnne Graham, Alphy Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 1:2021cv06142
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
