Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clanton v. blinken et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Brown et al
as 3:2021cv01072
Plaintiff:
Chante Silmaya Bey
Defendant:
Michael J. Brown and Claudia A. Baio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brown v. Kopek et al
as 6:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Brown
Defendant:
Robert Kopek , Utica Police Department , David R. Roefaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lebron v. Furco et al
as 7:2010cv02868
Plaintiff:
David Lebron
Defendant:
Anthony J. Furco, George O. Darden, Noramie F. Jasmin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Castleton State College
as 1:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Brown
Defendant:
Castleton State College
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lebron v. Furco et al
as 7:2007cv01293
Plaintiff:
David Lebron and David Lebron
Defendant:
Anthony J. Furco, George O. Darden, Noramie F. Jasmin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
