Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gonzalez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02143
Plaintiff:
Dionis Gonzalez and Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
City Of New York , John Does 1 and 2 and John LaBianca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gonzalez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
The City of New York , Robert Morales, Michael Scarano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Jason Balkum v. Donald Sawyer
as 10-4517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Balkum
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Peter Hanmer, Nikihili Nihalani and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jose Gonzalez, Jr. and Bezazel Wurzberger, FKA Bezazel Wurzburger
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzalez et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08350
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez, III and Jason Ortiz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael Brown and Carlos Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Pena v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv01742
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez-Pena
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department and Rafael Astacio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Balkum v. Sawyer et al
as 9:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Jason Balkum
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Peter Hanmer, Nikihili Nihalani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balkum v. Sawyer et al
as 6:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Jason Balkum
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Peter Hanmer, Nikihili Nihalani and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
