Cases 1 - 10 of 10
v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) et al
as 6:2022cv06428
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS), M. Coryer, M.D. John J. Ricciardelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Goodnough v. Becker et al
as 1:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Goodnough
Defendant:
Carl F. Becker, Andrew Cuomo, Johnathan Lippman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dixon v. Northrop Grumman
as 1:2008cv09796
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Dixon
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Verizon
as 1:2008cv09794
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Dixon
Defendant:
Verizon
Consolidated Defendant:
AT&T, Northrop Grumman, Trump Larc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mandal, et al v. The City of New York, et al
as 1:2002cv01234
Plaintiff:
Shreya Mandal, Jacques Aboaf, Brigit Greeson Alvarez and others
Petitioner:
William Rashbaum and John Marzulli
Defendant:
The City of New York, Bernard Kerik, Howard Safir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
