Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Kashelkar v. The United States Government
as 1:2024cv02722
Plaintiff:
Ashok Kashelkar
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sutton v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Kareem Sutton
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. United states Government
as 1:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
United states Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
King v. United States Government Federal et al
as 1:2023cv04860
Plaintiff:
Joseph A.. King
Defendant:
United States Government Federal and Unronan United States Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rahman v. United States Government
as 23-773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shahidah Rahman
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Government, MV Transportation, DMV Driver 981-740-482, Transcore Para Transit, Driver and others
Parham v. The United States Government
as 1:2022cv10568
Plaintiff:
Jamar Parham
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campos v. BMW Miami
as 22-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Campos
Defendant / Appellee:
BMW Miami, TD Bank, Coney Island Hospital and others
Humphrey v. IRS
as 22-1052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Jay Humphrey
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, United States Government, Justice Northern District of New York and others
Padilla v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States Government
Graves v. United States Government et al
as 1:2021cv04998
Plaintiff:
Donald Graves
Defendant:
United States Government, The State of New York, New York City Supreme Court, Criminal Term and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
