Cases 111 - 120 of 243
Edwards v. Armor Correctional Health Service et al
as 2:2016cv02289
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Service, Nassau County Sheriff Dept. and Dr. Carl Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Richard Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2016cv02889
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Sanchez and Canteen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sanchez
as 1:2016cv02890
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Smith
Defendant:
Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2016cv01961
Plaintiff:
Gary Sanchez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Griffin
as 1:2016cv00428
Petitioner:
Daniel Sanchez
Respondent:
Thomas Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv09957
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Sanchez
Defendant:
John Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Youngblood v. Warden
as 15-2661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andre Youngblood
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, of Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center, City of New York, Detective Louis Pena, 6992 and others
Defendant:
Clinic, of Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center
Pottinger v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
Akeem Pottinger
Defendant:
Sanchez, Alicea, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Armor Correctional Health Service et al
as 2:2015cv04791
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Service, Nassau County Sheriff Dept. and Dr. Carl Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Richard Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. City of New York: Office et al
as 1:2015cv06109
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Sanchez
Defendant:
City of New York: Office, NYPD Commissioner: Office, NYPD 41st Pct, Chief Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
