Cases 161 - 170 of 63,408
Rosales-Garcia v. Howard
as 2:2024cv03662
Petitioner:
Ovidio A. Rosales-Garcia
Respondent:
David Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradbury v. City of Montpelier, VT et al
as 1:2024cv03848
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Bradbury
Defendant:
City of Montpelier, VT and Montpelier, VT Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03859
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gonzalez
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer John June, Correctional Officer John Randazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennings et al v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
Antonio Bennings and Addison Bennings
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manson v. Caron et al
as 3:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
James Manson
Defendant:
Caron, Ogando and Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Wilkey et al
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Keenan Campbell
Defendant:
Wilkey, Jackson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wolcott
as 9:2024cv00661
Petitioner:
Vandon Jones
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Tykhan Thompson
Defendant:
Sullivan Correctional Facility, Frarik-Captain of SHU and Frankcoti-Captain of SMU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06305
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayo v. Spotten et al
as 3:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Mayo
Defendant:
Kerri Spotten, Jane Doe, Marissa Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
