Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Lewis et al v. Delmar et al
as 6:2021cv06738
Plaintiff:
Rommel Lewis and Keisha Knight Lilly
Defendant:
T. Delmar, Superintendent Amy Lamanna, Lieutenant Richard J. Goodliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Delmar et al
as 1:2021cv10191
Plaintiff:
Rommel Lewis and Keisha Knight Lilly
Defendant:
T. Delmar, Superintendent Amy Lamanna, Lieutenant Richard J. Goodliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Sewalt et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Timothy Sewalt, Corey May, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Superintendent
as 1:2021cv06482
Petitioner:
Samuel D. Mays
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
May v. Licon-Vitali
as 3:2020cv01105
Petitioner:
Russell Thomas May
Respondent:
Marti Licon-Vitali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter v. Morges et al
as 1:2020cv03367
Defendant:
Seargeant John Doe, Melendez, All who worked 7am-3pm on May 14 2019 3 Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hundley v. Frunzi et al
as 6:2020cv06150
Defendant:
B. O'Rourke, R. Snyder, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Crushaun Hundley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May-Shaw v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv03416
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Anthony Blum, PoliceOfficer Matthew Kancler and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peyton May-Shaw
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01639
Defendant:
Christopher Lyddy, Patricia Camp, Jennifer Zaccagnini and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv06145
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Mays
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
