Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Abraham v. Ebertz, et al
as 1:2018cv02033
Plaintiff:
Moore Abraham
Defendant:
City of New York, Noel Melendez, Franz Ebertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamothe v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv07923
Plaintiff:
Brenden Lamothe
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Abraham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Ponte
as 17-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest King
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Ponte
Defendant:
Warden B. Scott, Captain Tennille Pitts, #513, Barlett, Captain and others
Abraham v. Bertholet et al
as 3:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Joseph Benjamin Abraham
Defendant:
Dennis Bertholet, Omprakash Pillai, Mark Wassick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Radhakrishnan et al
as 1:2017cv04077
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Henry
Defendant:
Venkataraman Radhakrishnan, Joseph Freebern, David Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv00270
Defendant:
Sergeant Abraham, C.O. Alege, Captain Barlett and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ernest King
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, B. Scott, Tennille Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02882
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Jose Pizarro and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C.D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm. John/Jane Doe and Bus Drivers John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Peter Bohning, Abraham Thomas and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02314
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Peter Bohning and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C. D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm., John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
